MiR MiR1350vsUniversal Robots UR30
Universal Robots UR30 leads on 2 of 7 dimensions — strongest on future potential.
MiR1350
0 wins
UR30
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility48
- 82ROI clarity82
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement79
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayload30 kg (66.1 lbs), 35 kg (77.1 lbs) with boundary conditions
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeedMax TCP speed: 4 m/s
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBatteryNot applicable (arm-only, plugged to control box)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit75
- 68Future potential81
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)FootprintCompact footprint of Ø 245 mm; height and depth vary with configuration; 1300 mm reach
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
UR30 · Best for
Heavy-parts palletizing (20–30 kg boxes) on automotive or food production lines where floor space is premium
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.