MiR MiR1350vsUniversal Robots UR30

Universal Robots UR30 leads on 2 of 7 dimensions — strongest on future potential.

MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
Universal Robots UR30
Universal Robots
UR30
$65K–$85K
MiR1350
0 wins
vs
UR30
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

UR30
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    48
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    79
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    30 kg (66.1 lbs), 35 kg (77.1 lbs) with boundary conditions
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    Max TCP speed: 4 m/s
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    Not applicable (arm-only, plugged to control box)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

UR30
  • 75
    Environment fit
    75
  • 68
    Future potential
    81
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    Compact footprint of Ø 245 mm; height and depth vary with configuration; 1300 mm reach
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

UR30 · Best for

Heavy-parts palletizing (20–30 kg boxes) on automotive or food production lines where floor space is premium

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonMiR1350UR30

More head-to-head