MiR MiR1350vsPudu Robotics KettyBot Pro
Close call. MiR1350 and KettyBot Pro trade wins across the matrix.
MiR1350
1 wins
KettyBot Pro
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness85
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility88
- 82ROI clarity78
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement72
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayload10 kg per layer (22 pounds per layer)
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeed1.2 m/s maximum cruise speed
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBattery9 hours (no-load operation)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit82
- 68Future potential70
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)Footprint435 × 450 × 1120 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
KettyBot Pro · Best for
200–300 seat full-service restaurant dinner rush — single robot reduces food-runner headcount by 1–2 FTE, 9-hour battery covers evening service.
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.