Locus Robotics VectorvsMiR MiR1350

Locus Robotics Vector leads on 2 of 7 dimensions — strongest on future potential.

Vector
2 wins
vs
MiR1350
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Vector
  • 70
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 75
    Labor replacement
    78
  • Up to 600 lbs (272 kg)
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • Not disclosed by manufacturer
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • 8-10 hours on a single charge
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Vector
  • 79
    Environment fit
    75
  • 74
    Future potential
    68
  • 565 × 762 × 508 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
Vector · Best for

Wine and beverage distribution (case picking directly onto pallet dollies)

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head