Locus Robotics VectorvsMiR MiR1350
Locus Robotics Vector leads on 2 of 7 dimensions — strongest on future potential.
Vector
2 wins
MiR1350
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 70Price accessibility32
- 82ROI clarity82
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 75Labor replacement78
- Up to 600 lbs (272 kg)Payload1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
- Not disclosed by manufacturerSpeed1.2 m/sec maximum
- 8-10 hours on a single chargeBattery6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 79Environment fit75
- 74Future potential68
- 565 × 762 × 508 mm (W × D × H)Footprint910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
Vector · Best for
Wine and beverage distribution (case picking directly onto pallet dollies)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.