MiR MiR1350vspudu T300
Close call. MiR1350 and T300 trade wins across the matrix.
MiR1350
2 wins
T300
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility76
- 82ROI clarity72
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement68
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayload300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeedMaximum 1.2 m/s
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBattery12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit80
- 68Future potential70
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)Footprint780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
T300 · Best for
Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when T300's capabilities mature, track it.