MiR MiR1350vspudu t300

Close call. MiR1350 and t300 trade wins across the matrix.

MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
pudu t300
pudu
t300
$22K–$26K
MiR1350
2 wins
vs
t300
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR1350
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    76
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    72

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    Maximum 1.2 m/s
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

t300
  • 75
    Environment fit
    80
  • 68
    Future potential
    70
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

t300 · Best for

Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when t300's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonMiR1350t300

More head-to-head