MiR MiR1350vsPudu Robotics HolaBot

Close call. MiR1350 and HolaBot trade wins across the matrix.

MiR1350
3 wins
vs
HolaBot
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR1350
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    82
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

HolaBot
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    82
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    78

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    75
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    60 kg carrying capacity; 120 L volume with 4-tier loading zones
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    0.5–1.2 m/s (adjustable)
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    10–24 hours (replaceable battery)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

MiR1350
  • 75
    Environment fit
    72
  • 68
    Future potential
    55
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    541 × 531 × 1226 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

HolaBot · Best for

Full-service restaurant table bussing: 150–200-seat venue, dinner rush, 80+ table turns.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when HolaBot's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head