MiR MiR1350vsPudu Robotics HolaBot
Close call. MiR1350 and HolaBot trade wins across the matrix.
MiR1350
3 wins
HolaBot
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness82
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility82
- 82ROI clarity78
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement75
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayload60 kg carrying capacity; 120 L volume with 4-tier loading zones
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeed0.5–1.2 m/s (adjustable)
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBattery10–24 hours (replaceable battery)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit72
- 68Future potential55
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)Footprint541 × 531 × 1226 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
HolaBot · Best for
Full-service restaurant table bussing: 150–200-seat venue, dinner rush, 80+ table turns.
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when HolaBot's capabilities mature, track it.

