MiR MiR1350vsPAL Robotics StockBot
Close call. MiR1350 and StockBot trade wins across the matrix.
MiR1350
1 wins
StockBot
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility30
- 82ROI clarity78
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement72
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayload—
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeed—
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBatteryup to 12 hours continuous operation; fully recharges in 4 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit82
- 68Future potential75
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)Footprint46 cm (w) x 46 cm (d) x 183 cm (h)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
StockBot · Best for
Daily inventory cycles in large sporting-goods superstores (like Decathlon 4,000–9,000 m² flagship stores) to detect misplaced items and feed real-time stock data into planogram optimization.
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.