MiR MiR1350vsOmron MD-900

Close call. MiR1350 and MD-900 trade wins across the matrix.

MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
Omron MD-900
Omron
MD-900
$150K–$250K
MiR1350
1 wins
vs
MD-900
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR1350
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    23
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MD-900
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    900 kg
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    1.8 m/s
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

MD-900
  • 75
    Environment fit
    82
  • 68
    Future potential
    72
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

MD-900 · Best for

High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonMiR1350MD-900

More head-to-head