MiR MiR1350vsOmron LD-250

Omron LD-250 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on labor replacement.

MiR1350
1 wins
vs
LD-250
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    92
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR1350
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    26
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    85

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

LD-250
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    88
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    250 kg
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    1.2 m/s
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    13 hours unloaded, 10 hours at full 250 kg load; 20-80% recharge in 2 hours 10 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

LD-250
  • 75
    Environment fit
    82
  • 68
    Future potential
    78
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    718 × 969 × 383 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

LD-250 · Best for

Automotive final-assembly line — transport transmission blocks and wire harnesses between stations, reducing manual handler fatigue.

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head