MiR MiR1350vsNiryo Ned2

For high-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock)., MiR1350 is easier to deploy today — Ned2 is the longer bet on capability.

MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
Niryo Ned2
Niryo
Ned2
$5K–$6K
MiR1350
2 wins
vs
Ned2
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR1350
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    82
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    95
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    65

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    35
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    0.3 kg
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    —
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    —

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Ned2
  • 75
    Environment fit
    88
  • 68
    Future potential
    78
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    200 × 200 mm footprint
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Ned2 · Best for

Six-axis robotics curriculum in technical schools and universities

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when Ned2's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonMiR1350Ned2

More head-to-head