MiR MiR1350vsNeura Robotics MAV

MiR MiR1350 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
Neura Robotics MAV
Neura Robotics
MAV
$5K–$40K
MiR1350
1 wins
vs
MAV
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR1350
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    75
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    78
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    70

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MAV
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    72
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    MAV 500: up to 500 kg; MAV 1500: up to 1,500 kg
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    Up to 1.5 m/s
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    MAV 500: up to 7.5 hours; MAV 1500: 10 hours running time, 2 hours charging time

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 75
    Environment fit
    78
  • 68
    Future potential
    68
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    MAV 500: 678 × 1255 × 294 mm; MAV 1500: 910 × 1530 × 293 mm
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

MAV · Best for

Automotive parts supply loop in restricted-aisle assembly plants (400+ parts/shift).

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when MAV's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonMiR1350MAV

More head-to-head