MiR MiR1350vsNeura Robotics MAV
MiR MiR1350 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
MiR1350
1 wins
MAV
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness75
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility78
- 82ROI clarity70
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement72
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayloadMAV 500: up to 500 kg; MAV 1500: up to 1,500 kg
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeedUp to 1.5 m/s
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBatteryMAV 500: up to 7.5 hours; MAV 1500: 10 hours running time, 2 hours charging time
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit78
- 68Future potential68
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)FootprintMAV 500: 678 × 1255 × 294 mm; MAV 1500: 910 × 1530 × 293 mm
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
MAV · Best for
Automotive parts supply loop in restricted-aisle assembly plants (400+ parts/shift).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when MAV's capabilities mature, track it.