MiR MiR1350vsMiR MiR600

MiR MiR600 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

MiR1350
0 wins
vs
MiR600
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    92
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR600
  • 32
    Price accessibility
    36
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    88

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    85
  • 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
    Payload
    600 kg
  • 1.2 m/sec maximum
    Speed
    2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)
  • 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
    Battery
    up to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payload

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

MiR600
  • 75
    Environment fit
    90
  • 68
    Future potential
    75
  • 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

MiR600 · Best for

Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head