MiR MiR1350vsMiR MiR600
MiR MiR600 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
MiR1350
0 wins
MiR600
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 32Price accessibility36
- 82ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement85
- 1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kgPayload600 kg
- 1.2 m/sec maximumSpeed2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)
- 6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutesBatteryup to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payload
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit90
- 68Future potential75
- 910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)Footprint1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
MiR600 · Best for
Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.