Keenon T9vsMiR MiR1350
Keenon T9 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
T9
2 wins
MiR1350
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 92Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 87Price accessibility32
- 88ROI clarity82
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement78
- 40 kgPayload1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
- 0.8 m/sSpeed1.2 m/sec maximum
- 18 hoursBattery6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 90Environment fit75
- 75Future potential68
- 500 × 527 × 1,266 mm (W × D × H)Footprint910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
T9 · Best for
200+ seat banquet halls during wedding/event service rushes — robot handles multi-table delivery across wide aisles with zero staff training friction
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.