Aethon TUGvsKeenon T9
Close call. TUG and T9 trade wins across the matrix.
TUG
1 wins
T9
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 95Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 34Price accessibility87
- 90ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement85
- 453.6 kg (1,000 lbs for TUG T3)Payload40 kg
- 1 m/s (3.6 km/h)Speed0.8 m/s
- 24 hours intermittent chargingBattery18 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 90Environment fit90
- 75Future potential75
- 1,160 × 570 × 1,220 mm (length × width × height)Footprint500 × 527 × 1,266 mm (W × D × H)
TUG · Best for
Large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload
T9 · Best for
200+ seat banquet halls during wedding/event service rushes — robot handles multi-table delivery across wide aisles with zero staff training friction
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.