FANUC CRX-10iAvsOmron MD-900
FANUC CRX-10iA leads on 2 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
CRX-10iA
2 wins
MD-900
0 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 61Price accessibility23
- 82ROI clarity75
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 78Labor replacement78
- 10 kgPayload900 kg
- Max joint speeds: J1–J2 360°/s, J3 540°/s, J4–J6 380°/s; operational speeds 120–180°/s across jointsSpeed1.8 m/s
- N/A – mains-powered (100–240V AC)Battery8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 85Environment fit82
- 72Future potential72
- Robot arm width ~245 mm; teach pendant 335 × 176 × 120 mmFootprint944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
CRX-10iA · Best for
CNC machine tending — load/unload parts from spindles in 5–50-second cycles
MD-900 · Best for
High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.