FANUC CRX-10iAvsOmron Robotics MD 650

FANUC CRX-10iA leads on 2 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

CRX-10iA
2 wins
vs
MD 650
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    92
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

CRX-10iA
  • 61
    Price accessibility
    30
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

CRX-10iA
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 10 kg
    Payload
    650 kg
  • Max joint speeds: J1–J2 360°/s, J3 540°/s, J4–J6 380°/s; operational speeds 120–180°/s across joints
    Speed
    2.2 m/s
  • N/A – mains-powered (100–240V AC)
    Battery
    8 hours (5% to 95% charging in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 85
    Environment fit
    82
  • 72
    Future potential
    71
  • Robot arm width ~245 mm; teach pendant 335 × 176 × 120 mm
    Footprint
    Width 944 mm x Length 1194 mm x Height 320 mm; Vehicle Weight 249 kg
CRX-10iA · Best for

CNC machine tending — load/unload parts from spindles in 5–50-second cycles

MD 650 · Best for

Inter-warehouse pallet staging: 8-hour shifts moving loaded EUR/US pallets between receiving, storage, and packing lines without conveyor infrastructure.

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head