FANUC CRX-10iAvsKeenon T9

Keenon T9 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

CRX-10iA
0 wins
vs
T9
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    92
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

T9
  • 61
    Price accessibility
    87
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    88

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    85
  • 10 kg
    Payload
    40 kg
  • Max joint speeds: J1–J2 360°/s, J3 540°/s, J4–J6 380°/s; operational speeds 120–180°/s across joints
    Speed
    0.8 m/s
  • N/A – mains-powered (100–240V AC)
    Battery
    18 hours

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

T9
  • 85
    Environment fit
    90
  • 72
    Future potential
    75
  • Robot arm width ~245 mm; teach pendant 335 × 176 × 120 mm
    Footprint
    500 × 527 × 1,266 mm (W × D × H)
CRX-10iA · Best for

CNC machine tending — load/unload parts from spindles in 5–50-second cycles

T9 · Best for

200+ seat banquet halls during wedding/event service rushes — robot handles multi-table delivery across wide aisles with zero staff training friction

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head