FANUC CRX-10iAvsFANUC LR Mate 200iD

FANUC CRX-10iA leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

CRX-10iA
2 wins
vs
LR Mate 200iD
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 88
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 61
    Price accessibility
    81
  • 82
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

CRX-10iA
  • 78
    Labor replacement
    62
  • 10 kg
    Payload
    7 kg
  • Max joint speeds: J1–J2 360°/s, J3 540°/s, J4–J6 380°/s; operational speeds 120–180°/s across joints
    Speed
    11 m/s TCP max
  • N/A – mains-powered (100–240V AC)
    Battery

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

CRX-10iA
  • 85
    Environment fit
    80
  • 72
    Future potential
    65
  • Robot arm width ~245 mm; teach pendant 335 × 176 × 120 mm
    Footprint
    190 × 190 mm footprint; full envelope length 997 mm
CRX-10iA · Best for

CNC machine tending — load/unload parts from spindles in 5–50-second cycles

LR Mate 200iD · Best for

Electronics component placement and soldering in compact, multi-robot cells

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head