Clearpath Robotics Husky A300vsMiR MiR1350

Close call. Husky A300 and MiR1350 trade wins across the matrix.

Clearpath Robotics Husky A300
Clearpath Robotics
Husky A300
$19K–$19K
MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
Husky A300
1 wins
vs
MiR1350
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 85
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 81
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 72
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 45
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 100 kg (220.4 lb)
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • 2 m/s (4.4 mph) maximum
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • 4 hours standard; 8 hours with enhanced battery; 12 hours with extended battery
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Husky A300
  • 88
    Environment fit
    75
  • 80
    Future potential
    68
  • 990 × 698 × 372 mm (L × W × H)
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
Husky A300 · Best for

Precision agriculture research and autonomous navigation in difficult terrain

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonHusky A300MiR1350

More head-to-head