MiR MiR250vsUniversal Robots UR30

For order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (tti case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers)., MiR250 is easier to deploy today — UR30 is the longer bet on capability.

MiR MiR250
MiR
MiR250
$50K–$70K
Universal Robots UR30
Universal Robots
UR30
$65K–$85K
MiR250
3 wins
vs
UR30
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR250
  • 95
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR250
  • 56
    Price accessibility
    48
  • 80
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR250
  • 75
    Labor replacement
    79
  • 250 kg
    Payload
    30 kg (66.1 lbs), 35 kg (77.1 lbs) with boundary conditions
  • 2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
    Speed
    Max TCP speed: 4 m/s
  • 10 hours
    Battery
    Not applicable (arm-only, plugged to control box)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

UR30
  • 78
    Environment fit
    75
  • 70
    Future potential
    81
  • 800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    Compact footprint of Ø 245 mm; height and depth vary with configuration; 1300 mm reach
MiR250 · Best for

Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).

UR30 · Best for

Heavy-parts palletizing (20–30 kg boxes) on automotive or food production lines where floor space is premium

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR250. If the goal is to be ready when UR30's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonMiR250UR30

More head-to-head