MiR MiR250vsOmron MD-900

MiR MiR250 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

MiR250
2 wins
vs
MD-900
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR250
  • 95
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR250
  • 56
    Price accessibility
    23
  • 80
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MD-900
  • 75
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 250 kg
    Payload
    900 kg
  • 2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
    Speed
    1.8 m/s
  • 10 hours
    Battery
    8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 78
    Environment fit
    82
  • 70
    Future potential
    72
  • 800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
MiR250 · Best for

Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).

MD-900 · Best for

High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR250. If the goal is to be ready when MD-900's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head