Kinova Gen3vsPAL Robotics TIAGo Base
Kinova Gen3 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
Gen3
3 wins
TIAGo Base
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness72
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 73Price accessibility33
- 65ROI clarity65
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 40Labor replacement68
- 4 kg (mid-range continuous); 2 kg (full-range continuous)Payload70 kg
- 50 cm/s maximum Cartesian translation speedSpeed1 m/s
- Powered via 18-30 VDC external supply, 24 VDC nominal (36 W average power)Battery—
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit78
- 80Future potential71
- Total weight: 7.2 kg (6 DoF) / 8.2 kg (7 DoF); Maximum reach: 891 mm (6 DoF) / 902 mm (7 DoF)FootprintFootprint Ø54 cm
Gen3 · Best for
Research labs and university robotics programs developing control algorithms or human-robot collaboration workflows.
TIAGo Base · Best for
Indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Gen3. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Base's capabilities mature, track it.