Aethon TUGvsKinova Gen3

For large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload, TUG is easier to deploy today — Gen3 is the longer bet on capability.

Aethon TUG
Aethon
TUG
$105K–$105K
Kinova Gen3
Kinova
Gen3
$20K–$37K
TUG
1 wins
vs
Gen3
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

TUG
  • 95
    Deployment readiness
    85
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 34
    Price accessibility
    73
  • 90
    ROI clarity
    65

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    40
  • 453.6 kg (1,000 lbs for TUG T3)
    Payload
    4 kg (mid-range continuous); 2 kg (full-range continuous)
  • 1 m/s (3.6 km/h)
    Speed
    50 cm/s maximum Cartesian translation speed
  • 24 hours intermittent charging
    Battery
    Powered via 18-30 VDC external supply, 24 VDC nominal (36 W average power)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 90
    Environment fit
    75
  • 75
    Future potential
    80
  • 1,160 × 570 × 1,220 mm (length × width × height)
    Footprint
    Total weight: 7.2 kg (6 DoF) / 8.2 kg (7 DoF); Maximum reach: 891 mm (6 DoF) / 902 mm (7 DoF)
TUG · Best for

Large teaching hospitals (200+ beds) routing medications, linens, and lab specimens 24/7 to reduce manual delivery workload

Gen3 · Best for

Research labs and university robotics programs developing control algorithms or human-robot collaboration workflows.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TUG. If the goal is to be ready when Gen3's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonTUGGen3

More head-to-head