Keenon T9vsMiR MiR600
Close call. T9 and MiR600 trade wins across the matrix.
T9
1 wins
MiR600
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 92Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 87Price accessibility36
- 88ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement85
- 40 kgPayload600 kg
- 0.8 m/sSpeed2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)
- 18 hoursBatteryup to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payload
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 90Environment fit90
- 75Future potential75
- 500 × 527 × 1,266 mm (W × D × H)Footprint1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
T9 · Best for
200+ seat banquet halls during wedding/event service rushes — robot handles multi-table delivery across wide aisles with zero staff training friction
MiR600 · Best for
Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.