Keenon T9vsMiR MiR250
Keenon T9 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
T9
2 wins
MiR250
0 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 92Deployment readiness95
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 87Price accessibility56
- 88ROI clarity80
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement75
- 40 kgPayload250 kg
- 0.8 m/sSpeed2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
- 18 hoursBattery10 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 90Environment fit78
- 75Future potential70
- 500 × 527 × 1,266 mm (W × D × H)Footprint800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
T9 · Best for
200+ seat banquet halls during wedding/event service rushes — robot handles multi-table delivery across wide aisles with zero staff training friction
MiR250 · Best for
Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.