Keenon T10vsMiR MiR1350

Keenon T10 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on environment fit.

Keenon T10
Keenon
T10
$14K–$23K
MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
T10
2 wins
vs
MiR1350
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 85
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

T10
  • 82
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 78
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 72
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 40 kg (10 kg per tray across 4 layers)
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • 0.1–1.0 m/s adjustable; 0.8 m/s at full load on dry road
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • 6 hours nominal; up to 10 hours under optimal conditions
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

T10
  • 82
    Environment fit
    75
  • 76
    Future potential
    68
  • 486 × 555 × 1,399 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
T10 · Best for

200+ seat hotpot or casual dining chains during peak dinner service (one robot per 4–5 tables)

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonT10MiR1350

More head-to-head