FANUC M-2000iAvsMiR MiR1350

Close call. M-2000iA and MiR1350 trade wins across the matrix.

FANUC M-2000iA
FANUC
M-2000iA
$250K–$400K
MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
M-2000iA
1 wins
vs
MiR1350
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 90
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR1350
  • 10
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 85
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

M-2000iA
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 900–2300 kg (variant-dependent; M-2000iA/900L, /1200, /1700L, /2300)
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • 60–130° per second (max axis speed, variant-dependent)
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • Not applicable (mains-powered, industrial AC supply)
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 75
    Environment fit
    75
  • 65
    Future potential
    68
  • M-2000iA/2300 base footprint 1540 × 1480 mm; full arm reach 3734–4683 mm horizontal, 6200 mm vertical
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
M-2000iA · Best for

Automotive and metal industry heavy parts handling and car body transfer

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

Open interactive comparisonM-2000iAMiR1350

More head-to-head