Elephant Robotics myCobot 280vsMiR MiR1350

MiR MiR1350 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Elephant Robotics myCobot 280
Elephant Robotics
myCobot 280
$1K–$1K
MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
myCobot 280
0 wins
vs
MiR1350
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR1350
  • 82
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 95
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 35
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 250g
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • —
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • —
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 78
    Environment fit
    75
  • 72
    Future potential
    68
  • 280mm reach
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
myCobot 280 · Best for

Robotics curricula: Tabletop demonstrations of 6-axis kinematics and ROS path planning without PC requirement (Pi version).

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when myCobot 280's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonmyCobot 280MiR1350

More head-to-head