Elephant Robotics myCobot 280vsMiR MiR1350
MiR MiR1350 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
myCobot 280
0 wins
MiR1350
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 95Price accessibility32
- 65ROI clarity82
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement78
- 250gPayload1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
- —Speed1.2 m/sec maximum
- —Battery6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit75
- 72Future potential68
- 280mm reachFootprint910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
myCobot 280 · Best for
Robotics curricula: Tabletop demonstrations of 6-axis kinematics and ROS path planning without PC requirement (Pi version).
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when myCobot 280's capabilities mature, track it.