Doosan Robotics M0609vsMiR MiR1350
Close call. M0609 and MiR1350 trade wins across the matrix.
M0609
1 wins
MiR1350
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 69Price accessibility32
- 82ROI clarity82
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement78
- 6 kgPayload1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
- 1 m/s TCP speedSpeed1.2 m/sec maximum
- AC-powered (no battery)Battery6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 75Environment fit75
- 72Future potential68
- 900 mm working radius, compact mounting postureFootprint910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
M0609 · Best for
Screw-tightening and gear assembly on automotive harnesses in <5 m² cells
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.