DEEP Robotics LYNX M20vsUnitree Aliengo
Close call. LYNX M20 and Aliengo trade wins across the matrix.
LYNX M20
1 wins
Aliengo
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 72Deployment readiness72
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 51Price accessibility59
- 58ROI clarity62
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 65Labor replacement55
- 15 kg effective payload, 50 kg maximum load capacityPayloadup to 13 kg
- Maximum tested speed 5 m/s; maximum operating speed 2 m/sSpeed>1.5 m/s max walking speed
- 3 hours unloaded (15 km range) or 2.5 hours fully loaded (12 km range); 1.5 h charging timeBattery2.5–4.6 h operating time
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit78
- 76Future potential75
- 820 × 430 × 570 mm (W × D × H)Footprint650 × 310 × 600 mm (stand); 600 × 310 × 150 mm (fold)
LYNX M20 · Best for
Autonomous power substation patrol in rain/snow, avoiding high-voltage contact hazard
Aliengo · Best for
University SLAM and robotics coursework: 4.6 h endurance, developer-friendly I/O (GbE, USB 3.0), and ROS support enable weeks of lab experiments and student projects without infrastructure lock-in.
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

