DEEP Robotics Lite 3vsFigure AI Figure 02
Figure AI Figure 02 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on labor replacement.
Lite 3
1 wins
Figure 02
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 80Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 89Price accessibility31
- 60ROI clarity62
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 40Labor replacement72
- 5 kg (Basic) to 7.5 kg (LiDAR)Payload20 kg (standard); 25 kg (hand-specific carrying capacity)
- 4 m/sec peakSpeed1.2 m/s walking speed; 3 m/s max reported
- 1.5 to 2 hoursBattery5 hours continuous operation; 2.25 kWh lithium-ion torso battery with 1.5-hour rapid charging
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 70Environment fit75
- 75Future potential82
- 610 × 370 × 406 mmFootprintHeight 168 cm (5'6")
Lite 3 · Best for
Reinforcement learning training and algorithm development in university robotics labs
Figure 02 · Best for
Sheet-metal loading in automotive assembly — 2-second cycle precision on BMW X3 production line, 90,000+ parts handled in 11-month pilot
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.