Clearpath Robotics RidgebackvsMiR MiR1350

Close call. Ridgeback and MiR1350 trade wins across the matrix.

Clearpath Robotics Ridgeback
Clearpath Robotics
Ridgeback
$35K–$40K
MiR MiR1350
MiR
MiR1350
$125K–$125K
Ridgeback
1 wins
vs
MiR1350
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR1350
  • 80
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 68
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR1350
  • 55
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 100 kg
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • 1.1 m/s
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • up to 8 hours
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Ridgeback
  • 85
    Environment fit
    75
  • 70
    Future potential
    68
  • 960 × 793 × 296 mm
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
Ridgeback · Best for

University mobile manipulation research labs integrating collaborative arms (UR10, Baxter) with perception and grasping experiments

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR1350. If the goal is to be ready when Ridgeback's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonRidgebackMiR1350

More head-to-head