Aethon T3vsMiR MiR1350

Aethon T3 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

T3
2 wins
vs
MiR1350
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 92
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

T3
  • 34
    Price accessibility
    32
  • 88
    ROI clarity
    82

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 750 lbs (340 kg) for standard T3; 1,000 lbs (454 kg) for T3XL
    Payload
    1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
  • 30 inches (76 cm) per second
    Speed
    1.2 m/sec maximum
  • 10 hours with intermittent charging
    Battery
    6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

T3
  • 90
    Environment fit
    75
  • 72
    Future potential
    68
  • T3: 22.44" (570 mm) width × 33.81" (860 mm) depth × 48.1" (1,221 mm) height
    Footprint
    910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
T3 · Best for

300+ bed teaching hospital pharmacy-to-unit delivery during peak hours (morning/noon medication rounds)

MiR1350 · Best for

High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head