Aethon T3vsMiR MiR1350
Aethon T3 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
T3
2 wins
MiR1350
0 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 92Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 34Price accessibility32
- 88ROI clarity82
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement78
- 750 lbs (340 kg) for standard T3; 1,000 lbs (454 kg) for T3XLPayload1350 kg; towing capacity 6,000 kg
- 30 inches (76 cm) per secondSpeed1.2 m/sec maximum
- 10 hours with intermittent chargingBattery6.75 hours (max payload); 14.5 hours (without payload); charging 10–90%: 46 minutes
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 90Environment fit75
- 72Future potential68
- T3: 22.44" (570 mm) width × 33.81" (860 mm) depth × 48.1" (1,221 mm) heightFootprint910 × 1350 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
T3 · Best for
300+ bed teaching hospital pharmacy-to-unit delivery during peak hours (morning/noon medication rounds)
MiR1350 · Best for
High-density pallet lanes in automotive/metal fabrication: 800–1200 kg per load, 50+ moves/shift, predictable routing (e.g., mill → staging → truck dock).
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.