Pudu Robotics KettyBot ProvsKeenon DinerBot T5
Close call. KettyBot Pro and DinerBot T5 trade wins across the matrix.
KettyBot Pro
0 wins
DinerBot T5
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 85Deployment readiness82
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 88Price accessibility89
- 78ROI clarity76
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement79
- 10 kg per layer (22 pounds per layer)Payload40 kg (88 lbs)
- 1.2 m/s maximum cruise speedSpeedMax walking speed 1 m/s
- 9 hours (no-load operation)Battery4-hour charging time; DC 48V 12Ah battery
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit85
- 70Future potential72
- 435 × 450 × 1120 mm (W × D × H)Footprint507 mm W × 502 mm D × 1,204 mm H
KettyBot Pro · Best for
200–300 seat full-service restaurant dinner rush — single robot reduces food-runner headcount by 1–2 FTE, 9-hour battery covers evening service.
DinerBot T5 · Best for
100-seat hotpot restaurant during dinner rush (18:00–21:00); robot handles 60–80% of tray movements, freeing 2 servers for order accuracy and table check-backs.
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.