Pollen Robotics Reachy 2vsDirect Drive Tech TITA
Close call. Reachy 2 and TITA trade wins across the matrix.
Reachy 2
0 wins
TITA
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 75Deployment readiness72
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 51Price accessibility87
- 55ROI clarity58
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 45Labor replacement42
- 3 kg per armPayload10 kg
- —Speed3 m/s standard; up to 5 m/s with API unlock under suitable conditions
- —BatteryApproximately 1 hour per battery; 2-hour total runtime with battery set
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 80Environment fit78
- 85Future potential82
- Height 4.46 to 5.45 feet (mobile base variant)Footprint510 × 590 × 490 mm (standing); 300 mm height in creeping mode
Reachy 2 · Best for
Embodied AI training with demonstration learning and real-time teleoperation data capture for manipulation models
TITA · Best for
Campus package delivery across curved pathways and building entrances
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.