PAL Robotics TIAGOvsUnitree As2

Close call. TIAGO and As2 trade wins across the matrix.

TIAGO
1 wins
vs
As2
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

TIAGO
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    72
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Even
  • 53
    Price accessibility
    35
  • 45
    ROI clarity
    58

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 35
    Labor replacement
    65
  • 70 kg base; 150 kg with AI variant; 3 kg arm fully extended
    Payload
    25 kg (continuous walking); 100 kg (stationary)
  • 1.5 m/s max
    Speed
    5 m/s (11 mph)
  • 36V 20Ah Li-Ion (runtime not specified)
    Battery
    5 hours unloaded (20 km); 3 hours loaded (12.5 km)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

As2
  • 72
    Environment fit
    78
  • 76
    Future potential
    75
  • 54 cm diameter / 30 cm height (base); dual-arm variant TIAGo++ reaches 1.75 m high
    Footprint
    82 cm (H) × 44 cm (W) × 57 cm (L)
TIAGO · Best for

Research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs

As2 · Best for

Industrial inspection and emergency rescue across complex environments

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TIAGO. If the goal is to be ready when As2's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head