PAL Robotics TIAGOvsUBTECH walker C

UBTECH walker C leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.

TIAGO
1 wins
vs
walker C
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

TIAGO
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    68
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

walker C
  • 53
    Price accessibility
    66
  • 45
    ROI clarity
    52

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 35
    Labor replacement
    45
  • 70 kg base; 150 kg with AI variant; 3 kg arm fully extended
    Payload
    5 kg per arm
  • 1.5 m/s max
    Speed
    Up to 6 km/h walking/jogging
  • 36V 20Ah Li-Ion (runtime not specified)
    Battery
    Up to 4 hours on standby; 2 hours walking, 4 hours standing per charge

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 72
    Environment fit
    75
  • 76
    Future potential
    72
  • 54 cm diameter / 30 cm height (base); dual-arm variant TIAGo++ reaches 1.75 m high
    Footprint
    Approximately 1630 mm height
TIAGO · Best for

Research platform for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction studies in academic labs

walker C · Best for

International expo pavilions (live deployment at Expo 2025 Osaka as China Pavilion tour guide)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose TIAGO. If the goal is to be ready when walker C's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head