PAL Robotics TIAGo ProvsUnitree As2

Close call. TIAGo Pro and As2 trade wins across the matrix.

TIAGo Pro
1 wins
vs
As2
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    72
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

TIAGo Pro
  • 40
    Price accessibility
    35
  • 58
    ROI clarity
    58

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

As2
  • 45
    Labor replacement
    65
  • 3 kg (6.6 lbs) per arm
    Payload
    25 kg (continuous walking); 100 kg (stationary)
  • 1.5 m/s (4.9 ft/s)
    Speed
    5 m/s (11 mph)
  • 4 to 5 hours on single 36V 20Ah battery; up to 10 hours with dual batteries
    Battery
    5 hours unloaded (20 km); 3 hours loaded (12.5 km)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

As2
  • 68
    Environment fit
    78
  • 78
    Future potential
    75
  • Base height 1.2 m (3.9 ft), extending to 1.5 m (4.9 ft) with lifting torso
    Footprint
    82 cm (H) × 44 cm (W) × 57 cm (L)
TIAGo Pro · Best for

Bin picking and assembly in flexible manufacturing cells where force-feedback arms reduce collision damage

As2 · Best for

Industrial inspection and emergency rescue across complex environments

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head