PAL Robotics TIAGo ProvsPollen Robotics Reachy 2

Pollen Robotics Reachy 2 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on environment fit.

TIAGo Pro
1 wins
vs
Reachy 2
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    75
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

Reachy 2
  • 40
    Price accessibility
    51
  • 58
    ROI clarity
    55

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

TIAGo Pro
  • 45
    Labor replacement
    45
  • 3 kg (6.6 lbs) per arm
    Payload
    3 kg per arm
  • 1.5 m/s (4.9 ft/s)
    Speed
  • 4 to 5 hours on single 36V 20Ah battery; up to 10 hours with dual batteries
    Battery

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Reachy 2
  • 68
    Environment fit
    80
  • 78
    Future potential
    85
  • Base height 1.2 m (3.9 ft), extending to 1.5 m (4.9 ft) with lifting torso
    Footprint
    Height 4.46 to 5.45 feet (mobile base variant)
TIAGo Pro · Best for

Bin picking and assembly in flexible manufacturing cells where force-feedback arms reduce collision damage

Reachy 2 · Best for

Embodied AI training with demonstration learning and real-time teleoperation data capture for manipulation models

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head