PAL Robotics TIAGo HeadvsUnitree As2
Unitree As2 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
TIAGo Head
0 wins
As2
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 62Deployment readiness72
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 87Price accessibility61
- 48ROI clarity58
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement65
- None (tabletop head only, no manipulation)Payload25 kg (continuous walking); 100 kg (stationary)
- N/A (stationary head)Speed5 m/s (11 mph)
- Mains powered (110V/230V AC)Battery4+ hours unloaded (>20 km); 2.5+ hours loaded with 15 kg (~13 km)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 72Environment fit78
- 78Future potential75
- 320 × 255 × 450 mm (W × D × H)Footprint72 cm × 37.8 cm × 45.7 cm (720×378×457 mm, standing)
TIAGo Head · Best for
University robotics labs: Multi-year student projects in HRI, gesture recognition, dialogue systems
As2 · Best for
Industrial inspection and emergency rescue across complex environments
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose As2. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Head's capabilities mature, track it.