PAL Robotics TIAGo HeadvsPollen Robotics Reachy 2
Pollen Robotics Reachy 2 leads on 5 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
TIAGo Head
0 wins
Reachy 2
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 62Deployment readiness75
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 87Price accessibility51
- 48ROI clarity55
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 35Labor replacement45
- None (tabletop head only, no manipulation)Payload3 kg per arm
- N/A (stationary head)Speed—
- Mains powered (110V/230V AC)Battery—
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 72Environment fit80
- 78Future potential85
- 320 × 255 × 450 mm (W × D × H)FootprintHeight 4.46 to 5.45 feet (mobile base variant)
TIAGo Head · Best for
University robotics labs: Multi-year student projects in HRI, gesture recognition, dialogue systems
Reachy 2 · Best for
Embodied AI training with demonstration learning and real-time teleoperation data capture for manipulation models
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Reachy 2. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Head's capabilities mature, track it.