PAL Robotics TIAGo Basevspudu t300
pudu t300 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
TIAGo Base
0 wins
t300
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 72Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 33Price accessibility76
- 65ROI clarity72
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 68Labor replacement68
- 70 kgPayload300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
- —SpeedMaximum 1.2 m/s
- —Battery12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit80
- 71Future potential70
- Footprint Ø54 cmFootprint780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
TIAGo Base · Best for
Indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices
t300 · Best for
Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose t300. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Base's capabilities mature, track it.