PAL Robotics TIAGo BasevsPudu Robotics HolaBot

For full-service restaurant table bussing: 150–200-seat venue, dinner rush, 80+ table turns., HolaBot is easier to deploy today — TIAGo Base is the longer bet on capability.

PAL Robotics TIAGo Base
PAL Robotics
TIAGo Base
$90K–$150K
Pudu Robotics HolaBot
Pudu Robotics
HolaBot
$18K–$18K
TIAGo Base
1 wins
vs
HolaBot
3 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

HolaBot
  • 72
    Deployment readiness
    82
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

HolaBot
  • 33
    Price accessibility
    82
  • 65
    ROI clarity
    78

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

HolaBot
  • 68
    Labor replacement
    75
  • 70 kg
    Payload
    60 kg carrying capacity; 120 L volume with 4-tier loading zones
  • —
    Speed
    0.5–1.2 m/s (adjustable)
  • —
    Battery
    10–24 hours (replaceable battery)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

TIAGo Base
  • 78
    Environment fit
    72
  • 71
    Future potential
    55
  • Footprint Ø54 cm
    Footprint
    541 × 531 × 1226 mm (W × D × H)
TIAGo Base · Best for

Indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices

HolaBot · Best for

Full-service restaurant table bussing: 150–200-seat venue, dinner rush, 80+ table turns.

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose HolaBot. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Base's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonTIAGo BaseHolaBot

More head-to-head