PAL Robotics TIAGo BasevsPudu Robotics HolaBot
For full-service restaurant table bussing: 150–200-seat venue, dinner rush, 80+ table turns., HolaBot is easier to deploy today — TIAGo Base is the longer bet on capability.
TIAGo Base
1 wins
HolaBot
3 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 72Deployment readiness82
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 33Price accessibility82
- 65ROI clarity78
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 68Labor replacement75
- 70 kgPayload60 kg carrying capacity; 120 L volume with 4-tier loading zones
- 1 m/sSpeed0.5–1.2 m/s (adjustable)
- —Battery10–24 hours (replaceable battery)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 78Environment fit72
- 71Future potential55
- Footprint Ø54 cmFootprint541 × 531 × 1226 mm (W × D × H)
TIAGo Base · Best for
Indoor deliveries in industrial plants, hospitals, and offices
HolaBot · Best for
Full-service restaurant table bussing: 150–200-seat venue, dinner rush, 80+ table turns.
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose HolaBot. If the goal is to be ready when TIAGo Base's capabilities mature, track it.