Mobile Industrial Robots MiR1200 Pallet Jackvspudu t300

Close call. MiR1200 Pallet Jack and t300 trade wins across the matrix.

MiR1200 Pallet Jack
1 wins
vs
t300
1 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

Even
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

t300
  • 33
    Price accessibility
    76
  • 72
    ROI clarity
    72

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

Even
  • 80
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 1,200 kg
    Payload
    300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
  • 1.5 m/s
    Speed
    Maximum 1.2 m/s
  • 2 hours per charge (10-minute fast charge cycle); 8 hours total under opportunity-charging regime
    Battery
    12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

MiR1200 Pallet Jack
  • 82
    Environment fit
    80
  • 76
    Future potential
    70
  • W=820 mm, L=1,934 mm, H=1,990 mm
    Footprint
    780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1200 Pallet Jack · Best for

200+ pallet/day automotive sub-assembly feeds in multi-line production

t300 · Best for

Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)

Final judgment

Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

More head-to-head