Mobile Industrial Robots MiR1200 Pallet Jackvspudu T300
Close call. MiR1200 Pallet Jack and T300 trade wins across the matrix.
MiR1200 Pallet Jack
1 wins
T300
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 78Deployment readiness78
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 33Price accessibility76
- 72ROI clarity72
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 80Labor replacement68
- 1,200 kgPayload300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
- 1.5 m/sSpeedMaximum 1.2 m/s
- 2 hours per charge (10-minute fast charge cycle); 8 hours total under opportunity-charging regimeBattery12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 82Environment fit80
- 76Future potential70
- W=820 mm, L=1,934 mm, H=1,990 mmFootprint780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
MiR1200 Pallet Jack · Best for
200+ pallet/day automotive sub-assembly feeds in multi-line production
T300 · Best for
Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.