Mobile Industrial Robots MiR1200 Pallet JackvsOmron MD-900

Close call. MiR1200 Pallet Jack and MD-900 trade wins across the matrix.

MiR1200 Pallet Jack
1 wins
vs
MD-900
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MD-900
  • 78
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

MiR1200 Pallet Jack
  • 33
    Price accessibility
    23
  • 72
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MD-900
  • 80
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 1,200 kg
    Payload
    900 kg
  • 1.5 m/s
    Speed
    1.8 m/s
  • 2 hours per charge (10-minute fast charge cycle); 8 hours total under opportunity-charging regime
    Battery
    8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 82
    Environment fit
    82
  • 76
    Future potential
    72
  • W=820 mm, L=1,934 mm, H=1,990 mm
    Footprint
    944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
MiR1200 Pallet Jack · Best for

200+ pallet/day automotive sub-assembly feeds in multi-line production

MD-900 · Best for

High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MD-900. If the goal is to be ready when MiR1200 Pallet Jack's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head