MiR MiR600vsOmron MD-900
MiR MiR600 leads on 4 of 7 dimensions — strongest on ROI clarity.
MiR600
2 wins
MD-900
0 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 92Deployment readiness88
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 36Price accessibility23
- 88ROI clarity75
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement78
- 600 kgPayload900 kg
- 2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)Speed1.8 m/s
- up to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payloadBattery8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 90Environment fit82
- 75Future potential72
- 1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)Footprint944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
MiR600 · Best for
Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)
MD-900 · Best for
High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.

