Locus Robotics VectorvsNeura Robotics MAV
Locus Robotics Vector leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.
Vector
2 wins
MAV
1 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 88Deployment readiness75
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 70Price accessibility78
- 82ROI clarity70
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 75Labor replacement72
- Up to 600 lbs (272 kg)PayloadMAV 500: up to 500 kg; MAV 1500: up to 1,500 kg
- Not disclosed by manufacturerSpeedUp to 1.5 m/s
- 8-10 hours on a single chargeBatteryMAV 500: up to 7.5 hours; MAV 1500: 10 hours running time, 2 hours charging time
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 79Environment fit78
- 74Future potential68
- 565 × 762 × 508 mm (W × D × H)FootprintMAV 500: 678 × 1255 × 294 mm; MAV 1500: 910 × 1530 × 293 mm
Vector · Best for
Wine and beverage distribution (case picking directly onto pallet dollies)
MAV · Best for
Automotive parts supply loop in restricted-aisle assembly plants (400+ parts/shift).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose Vector. If the goal is to be ready when MAV's capabilities mature, track it.