Keenon W3vspudu t300

Keenon W3 leads on 3 of 7 dimensions — strongest on deployment readiness.

Keenon W3
Keenon
W3
$29K–$29K
pudu t300
pudu
t300
$22K–$26K
W3
3 wins
vs
t300
0 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

W3
  • 92
    Deployment readiness
    78
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

W3
  • 73
    Price accessibility
    76
  • 88
    ROI clarity
    72

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

W3
  • 85
    Labor replacement
    68
  • 20 kg (44 lbs)
    Payload
    300 kg (661 lbs); 400 kg in tow mode
  • 0.8 m/s (2.63 ft/s)
    Speed
    Maximum 1.2 m/s
  • Up to 12 hours
    Battery
    12 h (no load), 6 h (fully loaded)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

Even
  • 80
    Environment fit
    80
  • 72
    Future potential
    70
  • 459 × 549 × 1,081 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    780 × 500 × 1350 mm (W × D × H)
W3 · Best for

Hotel room service across multiple floors, reducing customer wait times

t300 · Best for

Automotive parts fabrication — autonomous tray delivery between assembly stations (6 h continuous, 400 kg tow mode)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose W3. If the goal is to be ready when t300's capabilities mature, track it.

Open interactive comparisonW3t300

More head-to-head