Keenon W3vsMiR MiR600
Close call. W3 and MiR600 trade wins across the matrix.
W3
1 wins
MiR600
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 92Deployment readiness92
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 73Price accessibility36
- 88ROI clarity88
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 85Labor replacement85
- 20 kg (44 lbs)Payload600 kg
- 0.8 m/s (2.63 ft/s)Speed2.0 m/s (7.2 km/h)
- Up to 12 hoursBatteryup to 8 hours 30 minutes at max payload; up to 11 hours with no payload
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 80Environment fit90
- 72Future potential75
- 459 × 549 × 1,081 mm (W × D × H)Footprint1,350 × 910 × 322 mm (W × D × H)
W3 · Best for
Hotel room service across multiple floors, reducing customer wait times
MiR600 · Best for
Medium-to-heavy pallet transport in automotive assembly plants (replacing 2–3 forklift shifts)
Final judgment
Both are credible picks. Decide on cost and supplier proximity, not capability — the gap is small.