Keenon T8vsOmron MD-900

Close call. T8 and MD-900 trade wins across the matrix.

T8
2 wins
vs
MD-900
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MD-900
  • 82
    Deployment readiness
    88
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

T8
  • 62
    Price accessibility
    23
  • 78
    ROI clarity
    75

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MD-900
  • 72
    Labor replacement
    78
  • 20 kg (across three tiers)
    Payload
    900 kg
  • 1.0 m/s (0.8–1.2 m/s adjustable)
    Speed
    1.8 m/s
  • 15 hours (label mode); 10–15 hours typical; 8–10 hours (laser mapping mode)
    Battery
    8 hours (5%–95% charge in <30 minutes)

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

T8
  • 88
    Environment fit
    82
  • 75
    Future potential
    72
  • 384 × 468 × 1123 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    944 mm (W) x 1194 mm (L) x 320 mm (H)
T8 · Best for

Narrow-aisle restaurants and cafes with tight kitchen-to-table distances

MD-900 · Best for

High-volume pallet transport in automotive assembly lines (sub-10 m² footprint, <2 m/s speed constraint)

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MD-900. If the goal is to be ready when T8's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head