Keenon T8vsMiR MiR250
For order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (tti case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers)., MiR250 is easier to deploy today — T8 is the longer bet on capability.
T8
2 wins
MiR250
2 wins
Category breakdown
Deploy & operate
Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity
- 82Deployment readiness95
- 60Maintenance confidence60
- Vision-led navigation (estimated)NavigationVision-led navigation (estimated)
- Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)ConnectivityWi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
Cost & ROI
Price accessibility and ROI clarity
- 62Price accessibility56
- 78ROI clarity80
Capability
Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement
- 72Labor replacement75
- 20 kg (across three tiers)Payload250 kg
- 1.0 m/s (0.8–1.2 m/s adjustable)Speed2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
- 15 hours (label mode); 10–15 hours typical; 8–10 hours (laser mapping mode)Battery10 hours
Fit & future
Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside
- 88Environment fit78
- 75Future potential70
- 384 × 468 × 1123 mm (W × D × H)Footprint800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
T8 · Best for
Narrow-aisle restaurants and cafes with tight kitchen-to-table distances
MiR250 · Best for
Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).
Final judgment
If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR250. If the goal is to be ready when T8's capabilities mature, track it.

