Keenon T8vsMiR MiR250

For order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (tti case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers)., MiR250 is easier to deploy today — T8 is the longer bet on capability.

T8
2 wins
vs
MiR250
2 wins

Category breakdown

Deploy & operate

Readiness, uptime, navigation & connectivity

MiR250
  • 82
    Deployment readiness
    95
  • 60
    Maintenance confidence
    60
  • Vision-led navigation (estimated)
    Navigation
    Vision-led navigation (estimated)
  • Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)
    Connectivity
    Wi-Fi / cloud fleet management (estimated)

Cost & ROI

Price accessibility and ROI clarity

T8
  • 62
    Price accessibility
    56
  • 78
    ROI clarity
    80

Capability

Payload, speed, runtime & labor replacement

MiR250
  • 72
    Labor replacement
    75
  • 20 kg (across three tiers)
    Payload
    250 kg
  • 1.0 m/s (0.8–1.2 m/s adjustable)
    Speed
    2 m/sec (7.2 km/hour)
  • 15 hours (label mode); 10–15 hours typical; 8–10 hours (laser mapping mode)
    Battery
    10 hours

Fit & future

Environment fit, footprint & long-term upside

T8
  • 88
    Environment fit
    78
  • 75
    Future potential
    70
  • 384 × 468 × 1123 mm (W × D × H)
    Footprint
    800 × 580 × 300 mm (W × D × H)
T8 · Best for

Narrow-aisle restaurants and cafes with tight kitchen-to-table distances

MiR250 · Best for

Order-picking cart transport in multi-level fulfillment centers (TTI case study: 5 units moving 250 kg shelves autonomously across distribution centers).

Final judgment

If immediate deployment is the priority, choose MiR250. If the goal is to be ready when T8's capabilities mature, track it.

More head-to-head